Monday, January 25, 2016

Journal Counting, Metrics, Ranking.

Journal ranking systems: CiteScore, SJR and SNIP

The most recent 2015 ABS Academic Journal Guide (report on abs ranking 2015) includes a compendium of alternate ranking metrics for the journals considered of relevance to the ABS. The table in the ABS ranking list provides (human) panel ratings (AJG, ABS), and (algorithmic) bibliometrics scores (JCR, SJR, SNIP).


  1. For broader topic discovery/occurrence across a wide range channels and public fora (Twitter, news, bloggers, other publication outlets) use the Altmetric Explorer.
  2. Run a keyword search on your topic at www.scopus.com
    1. Run a keyword search on your topic at https://apps.webofknowledge.com/
  3. Check the prestige rank of your sources using https://journalmetrics.scopus.com/. Scopus CiteScore is a journal ranking system based on a metric called the SCImago Journal Rank.
    1. And/or use InCites (Web of Science - Web of Knowledge) to compare journals using Thompson Reuters own Journal Impact Factor ranking system.
    2. And/or use Google Scholar's reports from records in its index system. It offers its own take on the arrangement of academic fields or categories - https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=en&vq=en Top publications recorded here are sorted by h5-index and h5-median values.
  4. For institutional reporting: Elsevier’s SciVal (www.scival.com).
Indices attempt to rank or measure journal prestige without the influence of within-journal citation behaviour. How does it work? The SCImago CiteScore is computed by allocating all journals included in a category (the index) an initial score (i.e. prestige=10). The score is then 'spent' between journals, an allocation of between-journal citations. Think of it as Google PageRank but for journals. We infer a journal is prestigious if its articles are frequently cited by articles from other journals. The value of a citation between journals is further increased if the other journal is also prestigious. 
Covered journals (a subset of all possible published journals) are assigned a calculated SJR (SCImago Journal Rank) number (see http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php). Constituent journals in the SCImago list can be viewed here (http://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php).

Thomson Reuters research reporting services include: ResearcherID, Web of Science (aka webofknowledge.com), InCites Journal Citation Reports, and EndNote.


Myself in various systems
SciVal links with the entry in Scopus
Via Dimensions
Impact through Scholar.Google.com
My ORCID orcid.org/0000-0001-7772-7660
My ResearcherID (aka Publons)













Steps to update your Author Profile to correct or update your results in Scopus 

A three panel system for research writing

Notes on using Scrivener's three panel arrangement for "first draft" research writing.
(n.b. this page is not a Scrivener tutorial; I presume you have completed the Tutorial).

The simple three panel arrangement is Binder + split window Editor.
Use the binder to organise "things" and the split editor window to display the fragment being written right now. The second pane of the editor will usually display a research PDF from the research folder.

The default folders in the binder are "Draft", "Research", and "Trash".
These are good names, keep them or change them if you prefer.
The draft folder is a place for writing fragments.
The research folder is a place for other things (PDF files, snippets of text from other sources, images etc.).

A four pane arrangement can also be used if you have screen space. Click on the "inspector" icon (blue circle with white "i") to open this fourth pane. Use the padlock icon to 'sticky' lock the inspector to a particular 'edit' if it is open in one of the 'editor' panes.
The 'index card' view of the inspector is the place for your synopsis of the 'edit'.
The 'inspector' synopsis (or image) is the content that is displayed on the cork board view in Scrivener.

The various open panels can also be re-organised and populated 'on the fly' by dragging objects onto an editor pane's header bar (images, PDFs, text fragments). The editor that has the focus will have a blue header.

Use View > Editor > Lock in Place to make a view in either pane 'stick' to the current Binder item. I use this to keep the Scrivenings view of the whole document in the left pane. I then work with the right pane to edit individual binder items. You can also lock the group view mode too if you like.

Useful pages, pointers and references
The Scrivener tutorial
Organizing Creativity blog
The Digital Researcher blog
Tim Brandes blog
*** JStor article on writing using Scrivener and Zotero

Friday, January 22, 2016

IS&O 2016: An evaluation of conference review systems...

Having reviewed the following:
  • Springer OCS: the Online Conference Service - https://ocs.springer.com/ocs/
  • ScholarOne (Sage / Thomson Reuter's integrated conference review/publication system). This system incorporates the old Manuscript Central application.
  • EasyChair - http://easychair.org/
Conclusions
I recommend going with Springer OCS
  1. It is FREE for us to use due to our publication contract.
  2. It is linked to Springer's systems for publishing proceedings, 
  3. It offers a fully featured call-review-to-publication cycle
  4. It easily supports the session structure proposed in supports the "draft conference schedule" with the "Sessions" feature
  5. It has standard built in roles (PC chair, PC Member, Author, Submitter, Reviewer, Subreviewer)
    • Important: PC chairs have admin rights to the OCS whereas PC Members have access to all content. In general volunteer reviewers should NOT be assigned to the PC Member role.
  6. It offers an internal discussion area and internal message system if needed
  7. It offers user self-subscription, password reset and fine grained permission control (via roles).
  8. Basically we'd be mad not to use it.
For further information on the OCS feature list have a look at:
www.springer.com/computer/lncs?SGWID=0-164-6-447109-0

Steps

Assuming we use OCS our committee members will need to register an account in the system.Even if you have another Springer account you will probably need to register for directly to OCS.

1. Register your preferred email/account at
https://ocs.springer.com/ocs/

2. Having done that the current PC Chair will be able to subscribe you to the IS&O 2016 account (ifip_WG8-2_WC_2016).
https://ocs.springer.com/ocs/home/ifip_WG8-2_WC_2016

3. Next step is to discuss and agree conference milestone dates. The following placeholders dates are indicative e.g.:
Phase:____________________ Deadline
Abstract Submission:______ May 11, 2016 (including posters, work-in-progess and position papers)
Paper Upload:_____________ May 11, 2016
Assignment of Reviewers:__ May 20, 2016 (assignment of AEs and reviewers)
Review period ends:_______ Jun 17, 2016
Decisions announced:______ Jul 5, 2016
Final copies:_____________ Sep 2, 2016

Consider working back from the final final deadline on the publication timeline?
For example, the finished manuscript copy for printing must arrive latest at Springer Heidelberg 7th Oct in order to guarantee availability of the books in Dublin, a couple of days before the conference starts.

4. Once members have registered accounts the PC Chair can modify permissions so that the roles are appropriate.

5. Once the conference is live any user will be able to submit a paper, and submit revisions, via:
https://ocs.springer.com/ocs/conference/submitpaperto/ifip_WG8-2_WC_2016

Paper Submission

The OCS enrolment / submission process provides authors with the following messages (email & and internal account message log):
1.  [OCS] Registration of new user account successful
ocs-admin@springer.com 9:45 PM (12 hours ago) Dear Firstname Surname,
A new user account was successfully registered for you. This email address was used:
(an email address)
If you ever should forget your password, you can request a new one here:
( https://ocs.springer.com/ocs/ForgotPassword/)

2. (optional) [OCS] Set New Password
Dear Firstname Surname,
Please follow the link to set a new password:
(password reset url)

3. [ifip82dublin_2016] Please verify post-processed document for [Your Document Title]
Dear Firstname Surname,
Recently a new document was uploaded for your paper        
  'Your Document Title'
In order to enhance compatibility with different PDF-Viewers, the uploaded document has been post-processed.  Please verify the post-processed document here:
  https://ocs.springer.com/ocs/conference/paper/verifydocument/ifip_WG8-2_WC_2016/URL
If there are any display errors or other problems please contact the PC Chair of this conference:
  https://ocs.springer.com/ocs/conference/contactpcchair/ifip_WG8-2_WC_2016

4. [ifip82dublin_2016] Submission received
Dear Firstname Surname,
Recently you submitted your paper
   'Your Document Title'
to the conference        
   'ifip WG8.2 Working Conference Dublin 2016'.
Please follow the link below to view the paper's detail page:
  https://ocs.springer.com/ocs/conference/paper/view/ifip_WG8-2_WC_2016/URL
Enclosed please find a schedule of the conference:
   1. Paper Submission (Until May 11, 2016 23:59 IST)
       Paper Upload (Until May 11, 2016 23:59 IST)
   2. Assignment of Reviewers (Until May 20, 2016 23:59 IST)
   3. Review (Until June 17, 2016 23:59 IST)
       Decision (Until July 5, 2016 23:59 IST)
   4. Final (Until September 2, 2016 23:59 IST)

Roles

The following User Roles are described in the OCS User Guide
The Program Committee Chair (PC Chair): is the head of the program committee of a conference. The PC Chair and all Co-Chairs are given this role. These people have full editorial control. PC chairs also have admin rights to the OCS 
Program Committee Member (PC Member): The program committee is the panel of voluntary users invited by the PC Chair. 

  • Important: if reviewers are subsequently chosen out of this committee, they should have their role reassigned from PC Member role to Reviewer role. This is because PC Members have wider access to OCS content. 
Author: Along with the submission of a paper a list of authors is provided. Additionally an author may be marked as a corresponding author, thus receiving all mails sent by the system regarding the paper.
Submitter: In many cases a secretary’s office or another representative submits a paper instead of one of the authors. Therefore the submitter role enables to file a paper for someone else, without having an author conflict with the paper. Since an author is prejudiced against his own paper, an author conflict prohibits that the user can be assigned as a reviewer to the paper, for example.
Reviewer & Subreviewer: These are our volunteers, conducting anonymous reviews anonymously. Very large conferences may also employ subreviewers to cope.

Information on manuscripts and submissions

The LNCS Web homepage that contains the following "Information for Authors of Computer Science Publications":
http://www.springer.com/computer/lncs?SGWID=0-164-6-793341-0

There is also a page for volume editors of proceedings volumes:
http://www.springer.com/computer/lncs?SGWID=0-164-6-791222-0
This page contains instructions for a more traditional workflow (read: without usage of the OCS). Nevertheless you will learn something about the overall process of publishing proceedings volumes within Springer's LNCS and its associate series.

The LaTeX support for authors can be found at
ftp://ftp.springer.de/pub/tex/latex/llncs/latex2e/llncs2e.zip

CS Proceedings and Other Multiauthor Volumes - Using Office 2007 Word are supported by
ftp://ftp.springer.de/pub/tex/latex/llncs/word/splnproc1110.zip


Predecessor conference proceedings:
IS&O 2014, held in Auckland, New Zealand (http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-662-45708-5)

Q: Now that we've got submissions what do we do?

Bidding and Assignment
These phases start simultaneously after the abstract submission phase has been stopped. The assignment phase ends after the bidding phase.

Bidding: A Program Committee Member (PC Chair and/or PC Member) bids for or rejects becoming a reviewer of a paper. If he doesn’t express his position he will be marked as indifferent. One way of running this is for the track chairs, associate editors or similar supervisory role to bid first. Then the AE/Chair takes responsibility for assignment of other reviewers (see below). OCS also has the possibility of an automated and market-style mode for PC Members to engage in bidding to review papers.

Assignment: A Program Committee Chair (PC Chair) assigns PC Members to papers. An assigned PC Member becomes a reviewer of the respective paper.

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

Explore Animation at the UK's NFTS

My notes on the Explore Animation MOOC on FutureLearn from the UK's NFTS.

Week 1:
The animation or film that inspired me?
I'm not sure it's an animation as such but I remember being completely taken in the opening scenes of Fritz Lang's Metropolis (1927). The special and visual effects team present us with a glowing misty cityscape of the future; advertisements light a busy scene of towering buildings interlinked by extravagant bridges full of traffic (they still have traffic jams in the future) and aircraft weaving between them in the air. Not quite a tilt-shift effect but it hinted at scale and depth, and definitely appeared to be a 3D space. I guess it combined both models and artwork, probably painstakingly rendered on the film cells or perhaps overlaid with a second strip of film. The effects were compelling, believable, the execution decades ahead of its time until echoed in the beautifully atmospheric Blade Runner (1982).

A definition of animation?
To breath life into an inanimate object/art/model/simulation. Manipulating a puppet or toy for one of my children, I might even be visibly there holding its arms, but its movement draws their eye away from me, the puppeteer, and I know my audience is focusing (knowingly) on the object. There is a fleeting magic, momentary, I can see them believing and I get to believe it too.


Follow up films.
Any Studio Ghibli production.
My Neighbor Totoro (1988)
The Triplets of Belleville (2003)
Bagpuss (1974)
The Jungle Book (1967)
Fantastic Planet (1973)
The Cameraman’s Revenge (1912)
Hedgehog in the Fog(1975)

Sharing 360° video?

So, you've got a 360 degree video file from your GoPro. What to do with it? Well, share it on YouTube. YouTube supports uploading and pl...